S&P 500 5,278.40 +0.45% NASDAQ 16,755.02 +0.67% DOW JONES 38,886.57 +0.32% RUSSELL 2000 2,084.45 +0.15% VIX 13.42 -1.52% GOLD 2,348.30 +0.21% OIL (WTI) 78.62 +0.18% US 10Y 4.28% -0.04%
All articles Labor Market

Which Is the Better Small-Cap ETF, Schwab’s SCHA or iShares’ IJR?

Which Is the Better Small-Cap ETF, Schwab’s SCHA or iShares’ IJR?

Key Points

  • The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF provides more affordable access to small-cap equities with an expense ratio of 0.03%.

  • The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF tracks 1,727 stocks across the small-cap segment, whereas the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF holds a more concentrated portfolio of 652 companies.

  • The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF tilts more heavily toward technology and healthcare than the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

  • 10 stocks we like better than Schwab Strategic Trust – Schwab U.s. Small-Cap ETF ›

While the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (NYSEMKT:IJR) offers concentrated exposure to profitable small-caps, the Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (NYSEMKT:SCHA) provides a broader, more tech-leaning portfolio with a lower expense ratio.

Small-cap stocks are often a source of long-term growth, and these two funds provide two distinct ways to capture that segment. While the iShares fund relies on a specific index that requires companies to meet established eligibility requirements, the Schwab fund casts a wider net across the small-cap universe.

Snapshot (cost & size)

MetricIJRSCHAIssueriSharesSchwabShare price$143.69 (as of 2026-07-08)$34.31 (as of 2026-07-08)Expense ratio0.06%0.03%1-yr return (as of July 8, 2026)29.90%34.20%Dividend yield1.10%1.00%Beta1.021.10AUM$108.0 billion$23.3 billion

Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year monthly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months. Dividend yield is the trailing-12-month distribution yield.

Cost-conscious investors may prefer the Schwab fund, as its 0.03% expense ratio is half that of the iShares fund. Given the yield gap is minimal, both ETFs are solid sources of consistent income alongside their primary focus on capital appreciation.

Performance & risk comparison

MetricIJRSCHAMax drawdown (5 yr)(28.00%)(30.80%)Growth of $1,000 over 5 years (total return)$1,394$1,427

What’s inside

The Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF tracks a broad index of 1,727 stocks, providing extensive diversification across the smaller tier of the market. Its portfolio leans towards industrials at 18%, technology and financials at 17% each, and healthcare at 15%. Its largest positions include Sandisk (NASDAQ:SNDK) at 5.30%, Lumentum Holdings (NASDAQ:LITE) at 1.14%, and Revolution Medicines (NASDAQ:RVMD) at 0.79%. It was launched in 2009. The Schwab fund has paid $0.36 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$34.31 share price works out to a 1.00% yield.

In contrast, the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF uses a more selective approach, holding 652 positions that meet the S&P SmallCap 600 eligibility requirements. The portfolio is diversified across financial services at 19%, industrials at 17%, and technology at 13%. Top holdings include Molina Healthcare (NYSE:MOH) at 0.67%, Brightspring Health Services (NASDAQ:BTSG) at 0.61%, and Viasat (NASDAQ:VSAT) at 0.57%. It was launched in 2000. The iShares fund has paid $1.64 per share over the trailing 12 months, which on its recent ~$143.69 share price works out to a 1.10% yield.

For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

What this means for investors

Both the Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) offer exposure to small-cap stocks, a great way to diversify a portfolio and gain exposure to high-growth companies. Deciding which to invest in depends on the fund’s approach that best aligns with your investment goals.

SCHA is the better choice if you want broad exposure to the small-cap universe. The fund’s large holdings deliver superior diversification but entails greater volatility, as illustrated by the ETF’s larger five-year max drawdown. Its ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, which Schwab reduced from 0.04% in June, is a compelling benefit. For investors with a “set-it-and-forget-it” mindset who want to hold for the long term, the low cost is an appealing consideration.

IJR may be more expensive, but its far larger AUM offers greater liquidity, providing tighter bid-ask spreads. Its screen for profitability helps to reduce the volatility that comes with unprofitable smaller companies, but that results in a reduced number of holdings. IJR is a good choice for active traders or those who want a fund with greater stability.

Should you buy stock in Schwab Strategic Trust – Schwab U.s. Small-Cap ETF right now?

Before you buy stock in Schwab Strategic Trust – Schwab U.s. Small-Cap ETF, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Schwab Strategic Trust – Schwab U.s. Small-Cap ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $395,679!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,294,805!*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 929% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

Robert Izquierdo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Lumentum and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Eagle One Intelligence

The edge serious investors read.

Macro shifts, market structure, and the ideas worth tracking — straight to your inbox.

Note. For informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.